Through Todor Zhivkov and until today - 80 years since September 9! Alexander Tatsov speaks to FACTS

Continuation…

- The date September 9 does not carry a clear message, but it is a fundamental one. Communism, socialism followed, and today democracy – is this the logical transition we had to make?
- “Communism” is the ideology – it is the first major revision of Marxism by Lenin – “Marxism-Leninism”, basically an anti-human ideology built on an incorrect pseudo-scientific basis (proved by history with the gigantic failure of Communism 1989-91; in the period 1918 – 1991 in all communist countries and around the world between 100 and 140 million were killed . the person – in the first place is the USSR… etc.). While “socialism” is the economic system built on a false economic foundation and contrary to man's basic instinct – the pursuit of happiness.
So TRANSITION is the norm, ie. a return from the abnormal/anti-scientific/anti-human, to the normal - a free democratic system and private property/market economy.

Although democracy in our country is currently more distorted, it exists.

A is distorted due to the dominance in the economy and administration of grandchildren and relatives of ABpFK. So the transition is not only logical, but also natural, like the transition between the Stone Age and the Iron Age.

- In order to arrive today in a democratic way to “dismantle“ monuments. Is this how modern history is written?
- It depends on the monuments. The communists removed (destroyed, blew up, moved) 30 to 40% of the monuments to those who fell in the wars of national liberation and unification and in the national liberation movement (the largest of these monuments was destroyed in Sofia). In Pirinsko, this percentage reached almost 100%, even graves were demolished there (the Tomb of Todor Alexandrov was blown up).
Instead, the communists erected hundreds of monuments to their “heroes”. (In the 1970s, the Central Committee of the BKP commissioned the BAS and the Museum of the Revolutionary Movement to calculate by name the number of victims among communists and leftist farmers, in the period between 1923 and 1944, i.e. for 21 years - the so-called “White Terror“). The results of the large-scale research carried out have been published in an album-reference entitled “Stars in the Ages”. There it appears that the number of victims is 4816. However, there is one detail: this number includes communist activists who died for a foreign political cause – for example, in Spain and elsewhere, in this

including those who were massacred during Stalin's repressions in the USSR, as well as those who died from diseases allegedly caused by enemy repression.

Including dozens of monuments and named settlements and institutions in memory of proven national traitors such as Gen. Radko Dimitriev, gen. Vladimir Zaimov, the proven renegade Nikola Vaptsarov, etc., as well as the occupying Red Army, which supported the seizure of power by the Communists (1944 - 1947).
So the idea of removing the monuments of occupiers, murderers and traitors caused an unprecedented reaction in the ranks of the GRANDCHILDREN (of RELATIVES and CLIENTS of ABpFC). That's understandable. The logic behind the reason on which they protest after their grandfathers and fathers destroyed national monuments remains unexplained (by this indicator, Bulgaria is unique in the WORLD). Why, for example, did they destroy a monument to Hitler, wasn't that history too? There is no logic here! History is written by facts reflected in documents, not by monuments! Monuments are not history, but simply a snapshot of a section of society about an event that may turn out to be quite different in subsequent eras. On the other hand, monuments are expected not to contradict public morals – to propagate murder and a misanthropic ideology…

- Power is not given, power is taken… That's how the story goes. Today – before another snap election, what should we remember when we talk about government?
- Thank God, we still have an electoral system that does not allow a “taking of power”. Whatever we say, the truth is that the country is in crisis, and the new elections do not seem to end it. Because “political quagmire” waiting for a new Messiah and until he gets Him, the crisis will continue… Until the next new Messiah, after which the procedure is repeated.
The whole point is that society itself is in crisis, and the nation is falling apart. The only thing that saves us is that nowadays - due to international agreements and alliances, it is very difficult for a country to be conquered, as it was in the previous centuries of European history (for example, at the moment, Russia is not able to capture Ukraine, which could have easily been done before 200).
Nevertheless, all the neighbors already understood our situation and started tearing pieces from the Bulgarian cultural community:
- the Serbs created a grammar of “Shopski/Torlaski“ language and proclaim this new “nation“
- the Greeks created “pomashka“ nation and the respective language, are invited to register the bagpipe as a Greek national instrument
- the Romanians have long appropriated a part of Bulgarian history, not to mention the North Macedonians
Our nation is falling apart, the demographic crisis is coming, morals are collapsing, the study of history (the teacher of generations) is being sabotaged by the “red professorship” (generically related to ABpFC), heroes are forgotten/banned/marginalized, traitors are glorified, the sense of national inferiority is heightened. The average intellectual level of the broadest stratum of the population is constantly falling, the same is observed among the young generation, and this process is especially worrying among the academic youth. On the one hand, the nation is crushed by the Russian fifth column, and on the other – from the conductors of Neo-Marxism (Cultural Marxism) in our country.

- We had a long reign under Todor Zhivkov – denounced as a criminal regime, and then we had the longest rule in the transition by Boyko Borisov. What are the lessons…
- Todor Zhivkov's regime, on the one hand, is purely communist - on the model of the system in the USSR. However, its duration (the longest in the social camp) is due to the personal qualities of Zhivkov himself, who, contrary to popular opinion, is a very experienced, cunning, intelligent and flexible politician, with significant acting abilities in the political game, especially in relations with leaders of the USSR…
Borisov stayed in power for similar reasons.

He turned out to be, anyway, the only significant politician in Bulgaria.

He realized early on that true reform was an extremely dangerous business that would cost the career (and party) of the perpetrator. Instead, he was content to be alone, “on manual control“ to fix the current problems of the institutions.

- On the building of the National Assembly it says "Union makes the strength", and DPS splits in two, BSP excluded its leader, GERB are sitting on the sidelines, and PP-DB just want votes. Where does the compound remain…
- When the nation is falling apart, the union is an extremely difficult task, almost impossible. As we have already said, it is possible that the Bulgarian nation will not be revived again after the blow inflicted on September 9, 1944. The opposite is possible only and only IF some national idea appears to unite the prevailing layers of society.
------------------------
Alexander Tatsov was born in Sofia. Worked at TU-Sofia (cat. Sapromat), and since 1995 as an entrepreneur in the field of technology. There are long-term studies in the field of national and world military-political and cultural history.