This would put a symbolic end to the Komsomol aspiration of the European bureaucracy to “implement the five-year plan in 2 years”.
European Komsomolism and bureaucratic inclinations erupted with particular pomp over the “sudden ” implementation of the green deal, a deal in which the interests of people were severed from “the interests of nature”, and it was placed on a pedestal, from the height of which it was clear that they, the people, are not interesting if in any way their existence contradicts the interests of nature. It turned out as if people are completely superfluous, as soon as they interfere with nature.
And in this, although there are serious grounds, because human activity and the development of modern society drains the resources of nature, puts it under extreme stress and a number of insoluble questions arise related to the restoration of nature, the general philosophy that we must stick to the works of Van Gogh, if we want to completely destroy them, but tie the caps to the bottles, has led us to simple, but irreversible at this stage details.
Europe, as the greatest exponent of the green deal, has led its population to pay exorbitant prices for lighting and heating, and in countries like Bulgaria, to the point that a country with five times lower incomes per population than the developed West has to pay three times higher prices for electricity and heat.
The world, scorched by its own actions, is beginning to realize itself and turn again to the bowels of the earth, but in homeland the consequences will not be quickly and easily removed, and the expansion of nuclear energy for us is becoming a mirage. The idea of building not one, but two more Chairs is also in rosy clouds!
And Greta may be a little out of fashion, but the consequences of “Gretanism” will be paid for a long time.
And this is hardly fixable and would hardly have such a big impact if the same European, bureaucratic, Komsomol enthusiasm in spending 800 billion on armaments were not observed.
Not that Europe does not need to strengthen its own defense potential, after lying on NATO's back for so many years, but the very construction of an economic union, such as the European one, will somehow have difficulty switching to common defense, and the idea of common purchase of weapons and equipment, strikingly similar to the common purchase of Covid vaccines, can feed the European bureaucracy with additional corrupt money.
And finally, I think, how many hundreds and, God forbid, thousands of European man-hours have been spent on the ingenious idea of having the caps attached to the bottles? How many meetings, how many discussions, how many plenary sessions, how many seminars and expert committees preceded this congenial decision.
And how much does it cost the European taxpayer. And does its value /on the way to it and the decision/ not exceed many times its green effect? At least there is hope that the millions of pages in making this decision were electronic, because otherwise the forest…. You remember…
Or does the price not matter when the mission is to stand glued to Van Gogh in protest?