I am not a fan of Terziev at all.
Diana Damyanova admitted this on "Facebook".
First, if he were a decent person, knowing /without/ the controversial biography of his family, he would never agree to be promoted to a high position precisely by the democratic community, because this job is like a wooden iron.
Second, if he were a decent person, he would not agree to be promoted by the so-called democratic community in an undemocratic way, i.e. by the bosses deciding /this according to Lencheto/ by deciding at a table and reporting it down for implementation. The sale of the mayoral post is one of the most dishonest and expensive /in electoral terms/ actions of the PP leadership.
Thirdly and finally, I don't think Sofia, where I was born and lived my whole life, has improved. I don't see not only that democratic leap, but I don't even see a trace of it.
I'm not a fan of Terziev... He should at least learn to articulate ideas, but that's like asking Petkov to speak Bulgarian.
But what makes "soy democracy" /according to Mitsov/ not only undemocratic, but also crazy.
Their expectations were disappointed! Well, my expectations have been disappointed, but I am not in an unprincipled coalition with the grandson of the DS, I was not promised that we would share power if we won it, and I was not the one who was slightly out of the game when power was won.
This same group saving Sofia, which allows itself, with the power given to it by the soy/according to Mitsov/, to be the last resort of good and evil, to flood the municipality with its absolutely ridiculous cadres, to moralize and teach, while in the meantime, with the power given “from above” it imposes its decisions, even when they are insane.
But… this entire circus group, both in its part of saviors and in its part of grandchildren, would not have been in the municipality at all if in the second round of the mayoral elections Bonev had not applied a grip with which he “hacked” the sociological exit polls and managed to impose the feeling throughout the voting day that Terziev was beating him by two/three to one.
Which strongly demotivates potential voters for Vanya Grigorova. When your candidate is losing by three to one, there's no point in walking to the polling station…
Which wasn't fair, but he thought it up, did it, succeeded, and those who succeed don't get criticized.
So, once he sold his political future to Terziev /I don't even bother to think about the price of this purchase and sale/, the savior from Sofia was forced to face reality. The simple reality that he doesn't have a majority to receive the post he was promised in return.
And after nearly two years of convulsions, he is now going around the media in a hysterical roar that… Terziev was Peevski's man.
On this occasion, I want to say that when complex social processes are explained with extremely simple explanations, it is either a matter of genius... or plain stupidity.