“The two letters that "Information Service" announced yesterday and today show contradictory actions and do not clarify what they did. In yesterday's letter, which is some kind of evidence, it is claimed that they provided all the materials to the Prosecutor's Office. After the reaction of the Constitutional Court and the statements from yesterday, today we see another letter that contradicts it. Obviously, this is an unlawful action by "Information Service", and what are the motives they must explain”. This was stated on NovaNews by Vanya Nusheva, a doctor of political science and an expert from the organization “Transparency without Borders”.
According to her, the whole picture is “a series of communication errors”.
”Information Service” should address its question to the CEC and the Constitutional Court, and not to the Prosecutor's Office”, added Nusheva.
Election expert Stoil Stoilov made the following appeal to the Constitutional Court:
”Dear ladies and gentlemen, if you want to wash your eyes, immediately publish the findings of the experts – what you have provided to “Information Service”. Otherwise, opportunities are created for speculation that the Constitutional Court is interested in the results of the elections before announcing its decision on their legality. This is not the job of the Constitutional Court. He should have already decided what to do with the missing ballots in bags”.
According to him, it creates a feeling that the Prosecutor's Office is being used as a bludgeon.