Not many people believed in the victory of Donald Trump. 80% of French people thought Kamala Harris would be elected US president.
With the active support of Barack Obama, as a representative of black Americans, she kept up with the struggle of “minorities” against white rich Americans, for greater social justice. In her program, Kamala provided for them special lower loans to obtain housing. The presidential candidate openly defended same-sex marriage, the right to abortion and the reassignment of minors at their own request. Violence against women also featured prominently in her program. The Russian threat and support for Ukraine in the war against the aggressor, a theme developed by Biden, found a worthy defender in her person.
The American and European editions, far from the obligatory professional objectivity, massively stood behind Kamala Harris. After The New York Times and CNN categorically propagate this position, what should the French and Bulgarian “parrot media” comment on?
Political scientists convinced of Harris' victory, who had never peeled a potato in their lives, poured an avalanche of jeers when Trump disguised himself as a McDonald’s chef. With their posts, they showed American society that they don't know him. Joe Biden drove the final nail in the Democratic Party's coffin by calling Trump voters – garbage.
On November 6, smart-beautiful Western political scientists, intellectuals and philosophers could not believe their eyes. The results of the elections turned out to be different from the predictions! Some of them even predicted riots, even civil war. Nothing of the sort happened. The result of the election was respected even by the defeated, and American democracy became an example.
The failure of the Democratic Party is primarily due to the personal qualities of Donald Trump. He turned out to be an excellent psychologist because he turned his attention to that part of American society that traditionally votes left.
The African-Americans on whom Kamala Harris relied were not seduced by promises of easy credit. Why? Very simple and logical. They did not want to be helped in order to subsequently encapsulate themselves with others in need of help. There is nothing more worthy than earning money independently through labor. Trump promised new jobs, which meant – new social opportunities. With their own money, every American citizen won the right to choose for himself where and with whom to live.
American women also fell short of Democrats' hopes. Kamala Harris' advisors missed the fact that a large majority of American women would rather be courted than sue a co-worker who suggested they have a nice ass.
“Latinos“, or Mexican Americans, contrary to predictions, voted to regulate emigration. You don't need to be a university graduate to appreciate that the influx of illegal immigrants works against the interests of the already regulated because the newcomers undercut labor prices.
Another nasty surprise came from Muslim voters. They voted en masse for Trump! Even if he supports Israel, Trump is adamantly opposed to same-sex marriage. For the Arabs living in the USA, this position of his is extremely important for them!
Last but not least is the voice of the Jews. Traditionally Democratic voters, this time they voted Republican in droves. In addition to being voters, many of them actively sponsor universities. Riots in the amphitheatres of Harvard, Stanford and elsewhere radically changed their choices.
The greatest victory of the new American president is the victory over Marxist ideology. He convincingly rejected the class struggle, which some theorists tried to replace with an ethnic one, by offering American society a new economic model based on “national capitalism”. Imposition of protective duties against imports. Use of natural resources, including oil and gas reserves, without any environmental impediments. Only economic growth can improve the social level of all American citizens.
As for the war in Ukraine, with his usual prickly humor, Donald Trump snapped: “Zelensky is the best businessman on the planet! Every time he visits us, he leaves with 60 billion dollars.“ An experienced businessman, the new American president is unlikely to continue pouring billions into the bottomless Ukrainian bucket.
In France “surprise Trump“ is commented on profusely. The media who have stood behind Kamala Harris, and they are the majority, predict with anxiety the near future. In contrast to them, in public opinion after the surprise, the question begins to creep in: “When will a French Donald Trump appear here too?“