Borisov announced that he will think about a cabinet. Which made Radev visibly uncomfortable. But the attraction of the day is Kyreto. He went to Radev to negotiate against Sarafov, but he did not foresee the obstacles in the whole scheme – the adventures of the financial exchanger Koprinkov, the most important, the smartest cadre in the presidency. Kireto already believes that he has created an anti-Sarafov coalition.
This commented on "Facebook" Kalina Androlova.
Kireto: “Peevski is afraid of him. Now we will also take away Sarafov's club...“ How broke do you have to be to say something like that?! First, the last thing that is true about Peevski is that he is afraid.
We can say different things about Peevski, but that he is a coward – no! He thinks fast, anticipatory, complex, forceful, long-term and can be brutal if he chooses.
This does not mean that Peevski should not be told things to his face, as they are.
BUT it's nice, by GOING OUT on the CARPET against Peevski, to be smart enough for the competition, to have and have proven in the public space that you have the necessary qualities, to be at least equal (at least mentally, and at least good and resourceful), to be able to place yourself respectfully in the eyes of the “enemy Peevski”, in order to ultimately manage to conduct a successful battle.
Honesty would also be a huge asset in such a war. Something that is completely foreign to PP leaders, even though they are the most likely to speculate and deceive the electorate by pretending to be the bearers of integrity.
The lie that they are honorable initially provided them with high electoral credibility. And the second thing that should be emphasized about Kiretto is that they all tried very hard to remove Geshev because he was Peevski's bat.
They worked with blood and sweat, and LOW METHANE to the Peevski mechanism, which would cut the powers of the chief prosecutor so that it didn't matter who he was, he wouldn't run amok unaccounted for, untouchable, etc. Did PP/DB deal with the constitutional reform?
This was the basis without which Bulgaria cannot move forward, introduce justice, carry out judicial reform, etc. Now suddenly Sarafov is the next Geshev!
And after the efforts against Sarafov to “remove him” we will have the next Sarafov, etc. Let the PP put away the kindergarten, the cubes and the roller coasters, and start first reforming their capacity to fight in the political space.
We don't see growth and training with them, we see degradation and their typical system-destructive self-confidence, on the basis of which PP raged like an illiterate tornado in the management of the state. PPs should know that the patrimonial state can be extremely resilient against shocks.
Because elites could be very adept at consolidating their power and influence through patronage chains.
This type of country is characteristic of our region, the Balkans, southern Europe, along the eastern border of Europe and in many parts of Asia. It is not our invention. Customers will always support their patrons to achieve a better lifestyle for themselves and their loved ones.
Poor countries with small internal markets, in post-totalitarian states, with weak and underdeveloped democratic institutions can hardly move in the model of the classic American democratic and meritocratic culture (which by the way also gives defects, as we can well see)!
Kireto is the last person who could change our, I would say, downright pre-modern country. I do not want to say that nothing should be done, that elites should not be required, that they should not be pressured for transparency and that corruption should be narrowed as much as possible. I want to say that the stupidity of PP is not just not fixing the infirmities in our country.
And destroys the foundations of this fragile structure, which was somehow being built until now.
Because our “elites” learn on the go. Kireto states that he wants to fight the organized clientelistic hierarchies, but he does not understand well what exactly it is about, what is the basis of these patronage chains, how they historically arise, is there at all an option for another development of Bulgaria and in what way it can be achieved.
What we do understand, however, is that the PPs must be left to their own devices at last, and the DBs must set about building around themselves an engine of understanding, something meaningful that can grow and assimilate the mass of PP for a constructive operational policy. It is smart to consider the facts of reality. It is unintelligent to rely on wild populism and maniacal illusions of self-importance, out of touch with reality.